نام كاربري
كلمه ورود
درخواست عضویت
کلمه ورود را فراموش کرده ام

صاحب امتیاز:جامعه جراحان ایران
مدیر مسئول:دکتر ایرج فاضل
سردبیر: دکتر سید عباس میرمالک
مدیر اجرایی:

آدرس:تهران، میدان هروی، خیابان وفامنش، کوچه جمالی غربی (گیتی)، پلاک 65-
کد پستی:1668753963
تلفن:26755411
دورنگار:26912113
پست الکترونیک:info@ijs.ir

صفحه نخست :: بخش مدیریت نشریهصفحه قبل

Journal Title: تابستان 93
Article title: Comparsion of Two Methods in the Surgical Treatment of Grade III Internal Hemorrhoid: Closed Hemorrhoidectomy (Ferguson) versus Laser Therapy

Article PDF File:
Page From: 42 To: 52      

Article abstract:
Introduction & Objective: Surgical therapy is still useful and preferred for patients with large third-degree or fourth-degree hemorrhoids. One of the novel methods in the surgical treatment of hemorrhoid is laser therapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome of closed hemorrhoidectomy versus laser therapy. Materials & Methods: In this study, 56 patients with internal hemorrhoids of grade III, who were admitted to the hospital, were divided randomly into two groups, each one containing 28 patients. The first group were treated by using laser hemorrhoidectomy and the other group underwent the Ferguson closed hemorrhoidectomy. Visual pain score and complications such as bleeding, urine retention, anal stricture, gas and fecal incontinence and infection were compared in the two groups. The data in questionnaire and forms were analyzed with SPSS software and descriptive statistics and if needed statistical tests of T-test and chi- square test was done, and if needed accurate Fisher test was used. A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered as statistical significance level. Results: There was no significant difference between age and sex in the two groups. Visual pain score in laser hemorrhoidectomy in the first 24 hours (1.42 ± 1.57) and during the first week (0.49 ± 0.39) was significantly less than the case of closed hemorrhoidectomy group (respectively 1.91 ± 2.57 and 0.58 ± 0.75). Except in the cases of bleeding, which was considered to be significantly lower in laser therapy than control group, the difference between the two groups was not significant as far as other complications is concerned. The two groups did not differ in duration of surgery. However, the cost of laser hemorrhoidectomy group was significantly higher (P< 0.001). Conclusions: Despite higher costs, laser treated hemorrhoidectomy patients experienced less pain than the standard hemorrhoidectomy patients. So, we suggested laser therapy as the preferable method in treating hemorrhids.

Article KeyWords:
Hemorrhoid, Laser Therapy, Closed Hemorrhoidectomy

Article Authors:
دکتر منوچهر قربان‌ پورFirst Author
دکتر امیر درخشان فرOther Authordr_derakhshanfar_a@Yahoo.com
دکتر امین نیایشOther Author
دکتر نازیلا فرنوشOther Author
دکتر مهدی اسکندرلوOther Author




بالای صفحه
صفحه اصلی  |  تماس با ما  |  آرشیو مجله  |  نقشه سایت  |  عضویت  |  ارسال مقاله  |  پیگیری مقاله

استفاده از مطالب این سایت با ذکر نام سایت مجاز می باشد   -   Copyright © 2007, 2009 - Last Update 5-11-2009
Powered By www.itpco.net    www.itpco.ir
( ITPCO ) شرکت توسعه انفورماتیک ایران
تولید کننده سیستم های تخصصی مدیریت نشریات و همایش ها و مورد تائید کمیسیون نظارت بر نشریات پزشکی وزارت بهداشت درمان و آموزش پزشکی کشور