Comparison of MRI and Myelography / CT Myelography to Determine the Exact Level of Decompression in Patients Suffering from Degenerative Lumbar Canal Stenosis

Tavallaii, A; Amirjamshidi, A; Karimi Yarandi, K

Comparison of MRI and Myelography / CT Myelography to Determine the Exact Level of Decompression in Patients Suffering from Degenerative Lumbar Canal Stenosis

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

A Tavallaii ¹

A Amirjamshidi ²

K Karimi Yarandi ³

¹ Neurosurgeon, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Sina Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery

² Professor of Neurosurgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Sina Hospital, Tehran, Iran

³ Assistant Professor, Department of Neurosurgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Sina Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery

Abstract

Introduction & Objective: Degenerative lumbar spinal canal stenosis is one of the common entities in neurosurgery. Myelography and CT myelography as one of the first diagnostic procedures still retains its place in some cases. MRI defects in understanding some dynamic aspects of this pathology have been exposed. In order to compare the diagnostic value of these two methods, few studies have focused on lumbar spinal canal stenosis, almost all of them were retrospective. This prospective study designed to compare the diagnostic value of these two methods and to determine the factors affecting reliability of each method. Materials & Methods: 83 patients underwent preoperative MRI and myelography-CT myelography. Pictures were anonymously assessed by two neurosurgeons and the number of levels required laminectomy was recorded according to each modality. Another neurosurgeon intraoperatively assessed the number of levels in need of laminectomy. Inter-observer reliability for each modality and coordination of preoperative findings with intraoperative findings were calculated using kappa coefficient. The impact of demographic, medical history, physical examination and radiologic findings on the superiority of either of the two modalities were analyzed using T test, Chi square and Spearman correlation coefficient. Analysis was performed with SPSS software and (P < 0.01) was considered as significant. Results: Kappa coefficient between two evaluators was 0.61 for MRI and 0.56 for Myelography-CT myelography. This coefficient for agreement of MRI findings with intraoperative findings in 2 evaluations was 0.52 and 0.5 whereas Myelography-CT myelography revealed 0.43 and 0.45 agreement in two evaluations. After excluding the patients with disc herniation, Kappa for myelography/CT myelography has declined considerably to 0.36 and 0.39 in two evaluations. In evaluating the impact of various factors on the diagnostic value of each of these modalities, only lateral recess stenosis was almost related to higher diagnostic value of myelography/CT myelography (P = 0.056). Conclusions: MRI with regard to higher agreement with intraoperative findings and higher Inter-observer reliability should be the diagnostic test of choice to decide on the extent of laminectomy. Myelography/CT myelography can be used for patients with lateral recess stenosis, patients with a history of previous lumbar spine surgery and Instrumentation or as an alternative to MRI with almost the same diagnostic accuracy in patients with disc herniation.

Keywords

Lumbar Canal Stenosis

MRI

Myelography

1. Bartynski WS, Lin L. Lumbar root compression in the lateral recess: MR imaging, conventional myelography, and CTmyelography comparison with surgical confirmation. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2003; 24: 348-360.

2. Weisz GM, Lamond TS, Kitchener PN. Spinal imaging: Will MRI replace myelography? Spine 1988; 13: 65-8.

3. Michael J, Styles B, Clarence J, Monroe L: Lumbar herniated disk disease: Comparison of MRI, Myelography and Post-Myelographic CT scan with surgical findings. Orthopedics 1994; 17, 2: 121.

4. Ozdoba C, Gralla J, Rieke A, Binggeli R, Schroth G. Myelography in the age of MRI: Why we do it and how we do it. Radiology Research and Practice. 2011, Article ID 329017.

5. Epstein N, Epstein J, Carras R, Hyman R: Far lateral lumbar disc herniations and associated structural abnormalities: An evaluation in 60 patients of the comparative value of CT, MRI and Myelo-CT in diagnosis and management. Spine 1990; 5: 534-9.

6. Shun JL, Ru SZ. MRI and myelography in the diagnosis of lumbar canal stenosis and disc herniation. A comparative study. Chinese Medical Journal 1991; 104(4): 303-306.

7. Grams A Gempt J Förschler A. Comparison of spinal anatomy between 3-Tesla MRI and CT-myelography under healthy and pathological conditions. Surg Radiol Anat 2010; 32: 581-585.

8. Wilen J, Danielson B, Gaulitz A, Niklason T, Schonstorm N, Hansson T. Dynamic effects on the lumbar spinal canal: Axially loaded CT myelography and MRI in patients with sciatica and/or neurogenic claudication. Spine 1997; 24: 2968-2976.

9. Alyas F, Connell D, Saifuddin A. “Upright positional MRI of the lumbar spine,” Clinical Radiology, vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 1035-1048, 2008.

10. Song K, Choi BW, Kim GH, Kim JR: Clinical Usefulness of CT-myelogram Comparing with the MRI in Degenerative Cervical Spinal Disorders: Is CTM Still Useful for Primary Diagnostic Tool? J Spinal Disord Tech 2009; 22: 353-357.

11. Morita M, Miyauchi A, Okuda S, Oda T, Iwasaki M. Comparison Between MRI and Myelography in Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis for the Decision of Levels of Decompression Surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech 2011; 24: 31-36.

12. Postacchini F, Amatruda A, Morace GB. Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Ital J Orthop Traumatol. 1991; 17: 327-337.

13. Danielson BI, Willen J, Gaulitz A. Axial loading of the spine during CT and MR in patients with suspected lumbar spinal stenosis. Acta Radiol. 1998; 39: 604-611.

14. Elsig JP, Kaech D. Dynamic imaging of the spine with an open upright MRI: present results and future perspectives of fmri. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2007; 17: 119-124.

15. Ferreiro Perez A, Garcia Isidro M, Ayerbe E. Evaluation of intervertebral disc herniation and hypermobile intersegmental instability in symptomatic adult patients undergoing recumbent and upright MRI of the cervical or lumbosacral spines. Eur J Radiol. 2007; 62: 444-448.

16. Hansson T, Suzuki N, Hebelka H, et al. The narrowing of the lumbar spinal canal during loaded MRI: the e-ects of the disc and ligamentum ﬂavum. Eur Spine J. 2009; 18: 679-686.

17. Willen J, Danielson B, Gaulitz A. Dynamic e-ects on the lumbar spinal canal: axially loaded CT-myelography and MRI in patients with sciatica and/or neurogenic claudication. Spine. 1997; 22: 2968-2976.

18. Ogikubo O, Forsberg L, Hansson T. The relationship between the crosssectional area of the cauda equina and the preoperative symptoms in central lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 2007; 32:
1423-1428.

19. Lee SY, Kim TH, Oh JK, Lee SJ, Park MS. Lumbar stenosis: A Recent Update by Review of Literature. Asian Spine J. 2015; 5: 818-28.

20. Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Wedge JH. Lumbar spinal nerve lateral entrapment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982; 169: 171-8.