The Study of Inguinal Hernia Recurrence Treated with the Method of Modified Repair with Mesh between 2006-2011

Amirfakhrian, SH; Kamali Ahangar, S; Gholizadehpasha, A

The Study of Inguinal Hernia Recurrence Treated with the Method of Modified Repair with Mesh between 2006-2011

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

SH Amirfakhrian ¹

S Kamali Ahangar ²

A Gholizadehpasha ³

¹ Resident of General Surgery, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti Hospital, Student Research Committee, Babol, Iran

² Research expert, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Research Development Unit of Shahid Beheshti Hospital

³ Associate Professor, Department of General Surgery, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti Hospital, Babol, Cancer Research Center

Abstract

Introduction & Objective: The choice of surgical procedure for inguinal hernia repair is one of the topics discussed in surgery. In this regard, recognizing the efficacy and complications of each of these methods, especially in comparison with each other, can be helpful. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate an inguinal hernia recurrence treated with the method of modified repair with the mesh. Materials & Methods: Patients with inguinal hernia underwent inguinal hernia (neuralgia) by the method Proline mesh repair without opening the transversalis fascia cortex during 2006 to 2011, were included in the study. Hernia recurrence cases (with the criterion of a patient's complaining of the return of symptoms in the appearance and examination of the physician and seeing the protrusion of the area in the look and the palpable cases of hernia in the examination by hand) were recorded by the mention of the recurrence period. All patients referred to the inguinal hernia who had undergone an inguinal hernia repair surgery were male. Results: In this study, 126 patients with inguinal hernia underwent inguinal hernia repair surgery were examined. The mean age of the patients was 51.22 ± 14.61, which was at least 18 and was at most 96 years. The follow-up study showed no recurrence in the studied patients. Conclusions: According to the results of this study, no cases of recurrence in an inguinal hernia repair method have been seen with the method of modified repair with the mesh.

Keywords

Inguinal Hernia

Recurrence

Mesh

Hernia Repair

1. Dinc T, Cete HM, Saylam B, Ozer MV, Duzgun AP, Coskun F. Comparison of Coskun and Lichteinstein hernia repair methods for groin hernia. Annals of surgical treatment and research. 2015; 89(3): 138-44.

2. Sarmast M, Beheshti F, Askarpour S. Repair of inguinal hernia with prosthetic mesh and comparision with tissue repair. Scientific medical journal of Ahvaz university of medical science. 2004(41): 10-5.

3. Paziar F, AskarPour S, Hafezi M, Sarmast Shoshtary M, Askarpour S, Hafezi M, et al. Clinical Features and Recurrence Rate of Inguinal Hernia among Patients in Imam Khomeini and Raze Hospitals. Scientific medical journal of Ahvaz University of medical science. 2007; 6(52): 10-5.

4. F. B, Andersen DK, Billiar TR, Dunn DL, Hunter JG. Shewartz s principles of surgery. 10^th ed. Philadelphia: McGraw-Hill; 2014. 1516-8 p.

5. Farhangi B, Modarres S, Nikbakhsh N. Comparision of the inguinal hernia repair with mesh and none mesh methods. Journal of babol university of medical science. 2012; 5(1): 12-7.

6. Zinner M, Stanley W, Ashley J, editors. Maingots abdominal operation. 13^th edition ed: McGraw-Hill Education / Medical; 2018.

7. Chandrasekar S, Jeyakumar S, Ganapathy T. Glue versus suture for mesh fixation in inguinal hernia repair. International Journal of Surgery .2018.

8. Sanford Z, Weltz AS, Belyansky I. Scientific Session of the 16th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, Jointly Hosted by Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) & Canadian Association of General Surgeons (CAGS), Seattle, Washington, USA, 11–14 April 2018: Poster Abstracts. 2018.

9. Safarnezhad N, Fesharakizadeh M, Taheri D, Afzalzadeh S. Comparison of Complications and Recurrence of Hernioplasty by open and Laparascopic Methods. 2007.

10. Simons M, Vos P, Hoitsma H, Obertop H. More recurrencies than expected following inguinal hernia surgery. Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde. 1996; 140(50): 2506-9.

11. Richards S, Vipond M, Earnshaw J. Review of the management of recurrent inguinal hernia. Hernia. 2004; 8(2): 144-8.

12. Ramanan B, Maloley BJ, Fitzgibbons Jr RJ, Bikhchandani J, Wood J, Richards AT, et al. Inguinal hernia: follow or repair? Advances in Surgery,
E-Book. 2015; 48: 1-11.

13. Vafaee F, Enshaee A. Comparison of open preperitoneal mesh vs. Lichtenstein Technique for repair of recurrent inguinal hernia. Journal of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences. 2012; 4(3).

14. Trevisonno M, Kaneva P, Watanabe Y, Fried G, Feldman L, Andalib A, et al. Current practices of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a
population-based analysis. Hernia. 2015; 19(5):
725-33.

15. Burcharth J, Pommergaard H-C, Bisgaard T, Rosenberg J. Patient-related risk factors for recurrence after inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Surgical innovation. 2015; 22(3): 303-17.

16. Andresen K, Rosenberg J. Management of chronic pain after hernia repair. Journal of pain research. 2018; 11: 675.

17. Yeganeh R, Kheyrollahi A, Beshashati M, Kazemi A. Prevalence of groin hernia and penoscrotal disorders in elementary-school boys in Khoramabad. Faculty of Medicine ShahidBeheshti University of Medical Sciences. 2004; 28(1): 59-63.

18. Ghoseiri G, Falah P, Naderi F. Comparison of Open Preperitoneal vs. Lichtenstein Technique of postoperative Complications and Recurrence in Inguinal Hernia Repair. Alborz University Medical Journal. 2014; 3(4): 261-5.

19. Barrat C, Surlin V, Bordea A, Champault G. Management of recurrent inguinal hernias: a prospective study of 163 cases. Hernia. 2003; 7(3): 125-9.