The Impact of Preoperative Nutrition-Based Prehabilitation on theSeverity of Postoperative Complications in Patients withEsophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Associate Professor, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Sina Hospital
Abstract
Background and Objective: Evaluating the effects of nutritional prehabilitation on postoperative complications in patients with esophageal cancer can not only contribute to optimizing clinical outcomes but also represents a key step toward evidence-based care and reducing variability in current treatment practices. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to critically analyze the existing evidence regarding the impact of preoperative nutrition-based prehabilitation on the severity of postoperative complications in patients with esophageal cancer. Materials & Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis, conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, aimed to assess the effects of preoperative nutrition-based prehabilitation—with or without adjunctive physical and psychological interventions—on the severity of postoperative complications in patients with esophageal cancer. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in five international and two Iranian databases up to September 2025. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Nutritional prehabilitation was defined as the administration of oral supplements or enteral nutrition for a minimum of 7 days, and some studies also incorporated physical training and psychological support. Data extraction, quality assessment, and statistical analyses were performed independently by two reviewers. Risk ratios (RR), weighted mean differences (WMD), and I² statistics for heterogeneity were used for data synthesis. Analyses were conducted using RevMan software, and a p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Five RCTs involving a total of 405 patients were included in this systematic review and metaanalysis. The pooled analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in the incidence of severe postoperative complications in favor of preoperative nutritional prehabilitation (RR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.48–0.92). Similarly, a comparable reduction was observed in studies employing multimodal prehabilitation (RR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.49–0.97). Conclusion: The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that preoperative nutrition-based prehabilitation—particularly when implemented as part of a multimodal program—can effectively reduce the severity of postoperative complications in patients undergoing surgery for esophageal cancer. Nutritional interventions should be considered an essential component of preoperative care in this patient population.
Iranikhah,A and Roosta,F . (2025). The Impact of Preoperative Nutrition-Based Prehabilitation on theSeverity of Postoperative Complications in Patients withEsophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Iranian Journal of Surgery, 33(Autumn), 35-43.
MLA
Iranikhah,A , and Roosta,F . "The Impact of Preoperative Nutrition-Based Prehabilitation on theSeverity of Postoperative Complications in Patients withEsophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis", Iranian Journal of Surgery, 33, Autumn, 2025, 35-43.
HARVARD
Iranikhah A, Roosta F. (2025). 'The Impact of Preoperative Nutrition-Based Prehabilitation on theSeverity of Postoperative Complications in Patients withEsophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis', Iranian Journal of Surgery, 33(Autumn), pp. 35-43.
CHICAGO
A Iranikhah and F Roosta, "The Impact of Preoperative Nutrition-Based Prehabilitation on theSeverity of Postoperative Complications in Patients withEsophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," Iranian Journal of Surgery, 33 Autumn (2025): 35-43,
VANCOUVER
Iranikhah A, Roosta F. The Impact of Preoperative Nutrition-Based Prehabilitation on theSeverity of Postoperative Complications in Patients withEsophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Iranian Journal of Surgery. 2025;33(Autumn):35-43.